TexMacs from a terminal, in which case the Mathematica plugin worked (it was suggested here. Even commercial programs (e.g., Mathematica) that conform to standard Linux practices can work in concert with other applications. Notice that TeXmacs is not based on TeX/LaTeX. Unfortunately, Gnuplot does not current work withe TeXmacs. I suppose these changes need to be done also if one wanted to use the stock tmmathematica.c provided in a TeXmacs installation.
#TEXMACS MATHEMATICA PLUGIN MAC OS X#
Converters exist for TeX/LaTeX and Html/Mathml. I am not sure from which version of Mathematica the old functions cannot be used in any case I could not compile the tmmathematica.c with the libMLi3.a choice without these changes in the case of Mathematica 10.0.0.0). I am referring to the script you posted to the texmacs-users list on which, as you reported back then, partially worked on the Mac OS X 10.6.6 with Mathematica 7.0. > Documents can be saved in TeXmacs, Xml or Scheme format and printed as Pdf or Postscript files. > Now, fixing the script so that texmacs would in all cases transparently > connect > to mathematica without any user intervention seems. If you want to typeset nicely, TexMacs for Windows is very user-friendly and avoids all the hassle with LaTeX. Since the time when Andrey wrote the script, there has been 3 major > releases of Mathematica and the added support of MacOS and Windows in Texmacs, > that all broke that installation script in various ways. The future is here: Perhaps also why this company is looking for a buyer. Scientific WorkPlace, Scientific Word, & Scientific Notebook For equations I can recommend TeXmacs, it's very user-friendly as these "scientific editors" go.įree program to type Wolfram Language -like syntax and get SVG or LaTeX outputĪs for math typesetting, I use Texmacs, very user-friendly.
0 kommentar(er)
